Facebook Pixel


The Limited Standard of Care of a Child

start your free consultation
Home The Limited Standard of Care of a Child

Who is at fault when a child runs into the street and is hit by a car?

Determining fault in accidents involving a child running into the street and being hit by a car is a compassionate and complex issue. The allocation of blame depends on various factors, including the age and capacity of the child, the actions of both the child and the driver, and the local traffic laws. Here are some key considerations to understand:

  1. Child’s Age and Capacity: The age and cognitive development of the child can significantly influence the assessment of fault. Very young children, such as toddlers, may not have the capacity to understand the dangers of the road entirely. In such cases, assigning significant fault to the child may be difficult.

  2. Duty of Care: Drivers are legally responsible for exercising reasonable care and adhering to traffic laws. This duty includes being vigilant for unexpected hazards on the road, especially in residential areas where children are more likely to play. Drivers must be prepared to react quickly to prevent accidents.

  3. Parental Supervision: The parental or guardian supervision level can also impact fault determination. If a child was unsupervised or left unattended near a roadway, it may be argued that the caregiver failed to protect the child from harm.

  4. Comparative Negligence: Many jurisdictions apply the principle of comparative negligence when assessing fault. Under this principle, responsibility can be divided between the child and the driver. If the child’s actions, such as darting into the street suddenly without warning, contributed to the accident, they may be found partially at fault. However, the driver may still bear a significant share of the responsibility for not reacting in time.

  5. Driver’s Actions: The driver’s actions leading up to the accident are crucial. If the driver was speeding, distracted, impaired, or otherwise negligent, they could be found at fault regardless of the child’s behavior. Drivers must always exercise caution, especially when children are likely present.

  6. Local Traffic Laws: Local traffic laws and regulations may specify speed limits, school zones, and other safety measures designed to protect children in areas with a high likelihood of pedestrian activity. Violating these laws can increase the driver’s liability.

  7. Expert Testimony: In some cases, experts may be called upon to provide testimony regarding the driver’s reaction time, visibility, and adherence to traffic laws. This expert analysis can be instrumental in determining fault.

  8. Emotional Distress: Accidents involving children can be emotionally distressing for both the child and the driver. This can impact the driver’s ability to react swiftly, but it may also be considered a mitigating factor when assessing fault.

  9. Legal Process: In cases where fault is disputed or unclear, the legal process may be necessary to determine liability. Insurance claims may be filed, and a lawsuit may be initiated if an agreement cannot be reached. Courts will examine the evidence, hear testimony from experts and witnesses, and apply relevant laws to establish fault.

The allocation of fault may be shared between the child and the driver, and the legal process may be required to reach a final decision. In such tragic situations, it’s crucial for all parties involved to approach the matter with empathy and sensitivity while seeking a just resolution that prioritizes the child’s well-being and safety.